Conclusion & First Impressions

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is an interesting part, as it represents a fresh start for the series both in a marketing sense, and in a lesser technical sense as well. As a successor to the Snapdragon 888, the new chip  completely revamps the CPU setup to new Armv9 architectures while also bringing a very large GPU improvement, massive new camera features, and a host of other new features.

Qualcomm’s decision to streamline the naming is in my opinion not that necessary. But after the transition from the Snapdragon 865 to the 888, things had arguably already kind of jumped the shark last year, so it’s not completely unexpected. What I really don't like is Qualcomm taking a note out of Apple’s PR strategies and really diminishing the amount of technical detail disclosed, dropping even things such as the IP block generational numbering on the part of the GPU, NPU/DSP or ISP. This kind of opaqueness works for a lifestyle product company, but isn’t a great marketing strategy or look for a technology company that is supposed to pride itself on the tech it develops. Whatever the marketing aspect and shift from Qualcomm, what does matter for most of our readers is the technical side of things.

Technically, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a larger upgrade in a lot of aspects. While Qualcomm isn’t quite as aggressive as what we saw from recent competitor announcements, the chip boasts a very strong showing on the part of the CPU configuration, featuring a new Cortex-X2 core at up to 3GHz, new Cortex-A710’s middle cores at 2.5GHz, and as well as the new A510 little cores. The performance metrics, at least on the part of the X2, look to be extremely solid, and while power efficiency is still something we’ll have to investigate in more detail in the next few weeks, is also seemingly in line, or better, than the expectations.

The new Adreno GPU really didn’t get the attention it deserved, in my opinion, as things are quite more complex than just what the presentations showcased. While we still don’t expect Qualcomm to be able to catch up with Apple or be as efficient as the upcoming MediaTek part due to lingering concerns on whether the Samsung 4nm process node is able to close the gap with the TSMC competition, the new architecture changes are significant, and we should see major improvements in performance and efficiency compared to the Snapdragon 888.

Finally, the biggest changes this generation were presented on the part of the camera and ISP system. Smartphone cameras over the last few years have seen tremendous progress in terms of capability and image quality, and rather than slowing down (in contrast to other aspects of a SoC), here it seems technology progress is still full steam ahead or even accelerating. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 ISP now features fixed function blocks for a lot of the typical “computational photography” techniques we’ve seen pioneered from the last few years, and I think this will enable for far greater camera implementations for many more vendors in 2022 flagship devices. So, while the rest of the SoC can be seen as a % gain in performance or efficiency, the new camera features are expected to really bring new innovation and experiences.

Overall, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 looks to be a very solid successor to the Snapdragon 888. And that’s what’s most important for Qualcomm: executing on developing and delivering a chip that the vast majority of vendors can rely on to implement into their devices. While the competition is diversifying and stepping up their game, it’s also going to be extremely hard to match or even surpass Qualcomm’s execution the market, and the 8 Gen 1 is unlikely to disappoint.

Massive ISP Upgrades, AI Uplifts
Comments Locked

219 Comments

View All Comments

  • BlueSwordM - Friday, December 3, 2021 - link

    That's just Sisvel doing things their way.

    There hasn't been any legal or financial move, and I'm not aware of AV1 supporters actually paying the fees to it.
  • Adonisds - Tuesday, November 30, 2021 - link

    I was sure they would add it this time. This is a huge disappointment
  • linuxgeex - Wednesday, December 1, 2021 - link

    The disappointing thing is lack of AV1 encode by all vendors in 2022, even on the desktop, even in the top-tier GPUs.
  • dotjaz - Wednesday, December 1, 2021 - link

    Are you stupid? Why are you disappointed by an impossible feature? Nobody expects AV1 HW encoder on a phone, at all. Nvidia will have some in 2022. It took Qualcomm 5 years to implement HEVC encoder. What makes you think 3 years for AV1 is possible?
  • ksec - Wednesday, December 1, 2021 - link

    Because that is what Open Media Alliance marketing promised. ( And failed to deliver )
  • ChronoReverse - Wednesday, December 1, 2021 - link

    Can you link the marketing slides with the promised arrival date of hardware encoders?
  • ksec - Wednesday, December 1, 2021 - link

    You should check out their original schedule of AV1 and delivering AV2 by "2020".
  • ChrisGX - Wednesday, December 1, 2021 - link

    Did they really promise AV1 encode capability in a mobile phone SoC? Commercial AV1 encoder ASICs, i.e. merchant silicon parts, are only just becoming available now. So far, even big players encoding content in AV1 have generally used software codecs running on high end CPU servers rather than specialised silicon developed in-house to get the job done.

    The following links point to a couple of products supplied by vendors of AV1 encoder ASICs as well as a broader range of issues around AV1 encoding of content and AV1 codecs.

    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/netint-an...
    https://netint.ca/netint-announces-the-worlds-firs...
    https://netint.ca/
    https://www.design-reuse.com/news/50175/chips-medi...
    https://www.wowza.com/blog/av1-codec-aomedia-video...
    https://www.streamingmedia.com/Articles/Editorial/...
    https://aomedia.googlesource.com/aom/
    https://www.visionular.com/en/products/aurora1-av1...
  • name99 - Thursday, December 2, 2021 - link

    HEVC was finalized in 2013
    Apple had working code on iPhone in 2014. (SW encode/decode, probably with some GPU assist).
    Apple had full HW decoder in iPhone 2015.
    Apple had full HW encoder in iPhone 2016.
    But the HW was not really "visible" until iOS11 in 2017, when Apple made their big transition from "our preferred codecs are JPEG and h.264" to "our preferred codec is HEVC".

    So
    - HW encoder in 3 yrs *was* possible. Of course VVC is more complex than HEVC.
    - chances are Apple will roll out a similar scheme -- experiment with (doubtless GPU-assisted) SW encode with current devices, ship a stealth HW decoder , then a stealth HW encoder, and maybe around 2024 transition their ecosystem to VVC (with two years of HW already in place, and a good enough SW solution for older HW).
  • BlueSwordM - Friday, December 3, 2021 - link

    Actually, there is already a consumer level HW encoder...

    It is called the Nvidia Orin SOC.

    I'm expecting Nvidia's next-gen GPUs to have AV1 HW encoding.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now