The ASUS ROG Maximus X Apex Review: X Marks the Spot, Literally
by Joe Shields on May 11, 2018 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
- Intel
- Asus
- ROG
- Aquantia
- 5G
- Coffee Lake
- Z370
Benchmark Overview
For our testing, depending on the product, we attempt to tailor the presentation of our global benchmark suite down into what users who would buy this hardware might actually want to run. For CPUs, our full test suite is typically used to gather data and all the results are placed into Bench, our benchmark database for users that want to look at non-typical benchmarks or legacy data. For motherboards, we run our short form CPU tests, the gaming tests with half the GPUs of our processor suite, and our system benchmark tests which focus on non-typical and non-obvious performance metrics that are the focal point for specific groups of users.
The benchmarks fall into several areas:
Short Form CPU
Our short form testing script uses a straight run through of a mixture of known apps or workloads and requires about four hours. These are typically the CPU tests we run in our motherboard suite, to identify any performance anomalies.
| CPU Short Form Benchmarks | |
| Three Dimensional Particle Movement v2.1 (3DPM) | 3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, derived from my academic research years looking at particle movement parallelism. The coding for this tool was rough, but emulates the real world in being non-CompSci trained code for a scientific endeavor. The code is unoptimized, but the test uses OpenMP to move particles around a field using one of six 3D movement algorithms in turn, each of which is found in the academic literature. |
| The second version of this benchmark is similar to the first, however it has been re-written in VS2012 with one major difference: the code has been written to address the issue of false sharing. If data required by multiple threads, say four, is in the same cache line, the software cannot read the cache line once and split the data to each thread - instead it will read four times in a serial fashion. The new software splits the data to new cache lines so reads can be parallelized and stalls minimized. | |
| WinRAR 5.4 | WinRAR is a compression based software to reduce file size at the expense of CPU cycles. We use the version that has been a stable part of our benchmark database through 2015, and run the default settings on a 1.52GB directory containing over 2800 files representing a small website with around thirty half-minute videos. We take the average of several runs in this instance. |
| POV-Ray 3.7.1 b4 | POV-Ray is a common ray-tracing tool used to generate realistic looking scenes. We've used POV-Ray in its various guises over the years as a good benchmark for performance, as well as a tool on the march to ray-tracing limited immersive environments. We use the built-in multi threaded benchmark. |
| HandBrake v1.0.2 | HandBrake is a freeware video conversion tool. We use the tool in to process two different videos into x264 in an MP4 container - first a 'low quality' two-hour video at 640x388 resolution to x264, then a 'high quality' ten-minute video at 4320x3840, and finally the second video again but into HEVC. The low-quality video scales at lower performance hardware, whereas the buffers required for high-quality tests can stretch even the biggest processors. At current, this is a CPU only test. |
| 7-Zip 9.2 | 7-Zip is a freeware compression/decompression tool that is widely deployed across the world. We run the included benchmark tool using a 50MB library and take the average of a set of fixed-time results. |
| DigiCortex v1.20 | The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. |
System Benchmarks
Our system benchmarks are designed to probe motherboard controller performance, particularly any additional USB controllers or the audio controller. As general platform tests we have DPC Latency measurements and system boot time, which can be difficult to optimize for on the board design and manufacturing level.
| System Benchmarks | |
| Power Consumption | One of the primary differences between different motherboads is power consumption. Aside from the base defaults that every motherboard needs, things like power delivery, controller choice, routing and firmware can all contribute to how much power a system can draw. This increases for features such as PLX chips and multi-gigabit ethernet. |
| Non-UEFI POST Time | The POST sequence of the motherboard becomes before loading the OS, and involves pre-testing of onboard controllers, the CPU, the DRAM and everything else to ensure base stability. The number of controllers, as well as firmware optimizations, affect the POST time a lot. We test the BIOS defaults as well as attempt a stripped POST. |
| Rightmark Audio Analyzer 6.2.5 | Testing onboard audio is difficult, especially with the numerous amount of post-processing packages now being bundled with hardware. Nonetheless, manufacturers put time and effort into offering a 'cleaner' sound that is loud and of a high quality. RMAA, with version 6.2.5 (newer versions have issues), under the right settings can be used to test the signal-to-noise ratio, signal crossover, and harmonic distortion with noise. |
| USB Backup | USB ports can come from a variety of sources: chipsets, controllers or hubs. More often than not, the design of the traces can lead to direct impacts on USB performance as well as firmware level choices relating to signal integrity on the motherboard. |
| DPC Latency | Another element is deferred procedure call latency, or the ability to handle interrupt servicing. Depending on the motherboard firmware and controller selection, some motherboards handle these interrupts quicker than others. A poor result could lead to delays in performance, or for example with audio, a delayed request can manifest in distinct audible pauses, pops or clicks. |
Gaming
Our gaming benchmarks are designed to show any differences in performance when playing games.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
39 Comments
View All Comments
evernessince - Friday, May 18, 2018 - link
That's a limitation of the chipset. If you want more USB ports on a consumer motherboard you have to get a Ryzen motherboard. The X370 Hero has 14 USB ports on it. Ryzen and the X370 chipset simply support more USB ports.WithoutWeakness - Friday, May 11, 2018 - link
> Regular ATX board that they decided to have random cutouts and extensions on the PCB that now requires an E-ATX compatible chassis> 10 fan/pump headers and water flow and temperature headers
> 4 full-length PCIe slots and an included SLI-HB bridge
> 5 Gigabit ethernet
> Only 2 RAM slots???
> $400???
I understand the appeal of the overclocking features and why people would look to buy this board if they wanted to push their overclocks another 100MHz but why is there such an absolutely absurd mishmash of features included like 4x PCIe lanes (without a PLX chip) and 5GbE? I feel like they took their original design for what should be the Maximus X Extreme and just started haphazardly trimming features like RAM slots and PLX support until they hit the $400 price point and said "ship it".
Really interested in the opinion of anyone who be looking to buy this board.
ggathagan - Friday, May 11, 2018 - link
I don't disagree with your overall point, but limiting the board to a pair of DIMM slots makes sense for a board that purports to be focused on overclocking.I don't recall any motherboard that can overclock with 4 DIMM slots populated as well as it can with only 2 slots populated.
mapesdhs - Monday, May 14, 2018 - link
Rampage IV Extreme might come close.The_Assimilator - Friday, May 11, 2018 - link
> talks about DIMM.2 slot> doesn't show any pictures of it with M.2 drives installed
> doesn't do any M.2 tests at all in fact
Billy Tallis - Friday, May 11, 2018 - link
What kind of tests do you want? It's a passive PCIe riser. It doesn't affect performance, it just relocates the M.2 slots away from your GPU(s).The_Assimilator - Saturday, May 12, 2018 - link
"It doesn't affect performance" Patently false, since reviews of M.2 drives by many sites - including this very one - have demonstrated that the highest-end models throttle during sustained workloads.Regardless of performance, DIMM.2 is a feature unique to this motherboard, and as such it should be covered by any review.
The test is relatively simple: temperatures/sustained transfer rates of a drive when using DIMM.2, vs those of the same drive mounted directly against the motherboard, vs that drive mounted against the motherboard but with the motherboards's supplied M.2 heatsink applied. For example, this board vs the recently-reviewed X299 XPower Gaming AC's M.2 cooling solution.
It should be something relatively simple to do and would make a great stand-alone article to answer the question that many people have, namely whether these fancy cooling solutions do have an effect on their M.2 drives' temperatures.
SlyNine - Friday, May 11, 2018 - link
Glad to see some more AMD *squints eyes* Intel boardsCityZ - Friday, May 11, 2018 - link
You see that connector between the SATA ports and the molex? Guess what it is.boozed - Friday, May 11, 2018 - link
The opening sentence gave me cancer.