Well that's an odd statement. One, I never mentioned anything about the manufacturing node and two, Broadwell was indeed a 14 nm product anyway. Lastly, it's also not something to get worked up over and perhaps there are even people who believe those chips are hotted up 386's ;)
Doubt they can magically get anything more without 10nm. And it seems they've bet everything on 10nm process and now squeeze breadcrumbs without having it at hand for mass production.
Incredibly underwhelming. Withholding HT on everything under and i9 is going to be really awkward when the Ryzen 3000s come out and eat their lunch, again, in anything remotely multi-threaded.
Given how these aren't even trying to compete, I'm a little nervous that Intel is counting on contracts and backroom dealings to not lose the entire desktop market.
"goes to show you how much Intel values its current graphics implementation."
Surely this is doubly true for how much Intel values its 'SMT' implementation?
i.e. hyperthreading.
All those eight core cpu's, all those six core cpu's, all those four core cpu's, and hyperthreading is available on only *some* of the eight core SKU's!
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
135 Comments
View All Comments
29a - Tuesday, April 23, 2019 - link
This world, Broadwell was 14nm.PeachNCream - Tuesday, April 23, 2019 - link
Just as reference: https://www.anandtech.com/show/7318/intel-demos-14...nismotigerwvu - Tuesday, April 23, 2019 - link
Well that's an odd statement. One, I never mentioned anything about the manufacturing node and two, Broadwell was indeed a 14 nm product anyway. Lastly, it's also not something to get worked up over and perhaps there are even people who believe those chips are hotted up 386's ;)Oyster - Tuesday, April 23, 2019 - link
Still just 40 PCI-E lanes... lame. I hope AMD matches/beats expectations with their new platform.HollyDOL - Tuesday, April 23, 2019 - link
Doubt they can magically get anything more without 10nm. And it seems they've bet everything on 10nm process and now squeeze breadcrumbs without having it at hand for mass production.gijames1225 - Tuesday, April 23, 2019 - link
Incredibly underwhelming. Withholding HT on everything under and i9 is going to be really awkward when the Ryzen 3000s come out and eat their lunch, again, in anything remotely multi-threaded.Given how these aren't even trying to compete, I'm a little nervous that Intel is counting on contracts and backroom dealings to not lose the entire desktop market.
gsalkin - Tuesday, April 23, 2019 - link
Got a small typo: the i7-9700s should have a base clock of 3.6 Ghz, not 3.0, per the slides.R3MF - Tuesday, April 23, 2019 - link
"goes to show you how much Intel values its current graphics implementation."Surely this is doubly true for how much Intel values its 'SMT' implementation?
i.e. hyperthreading.
All those eight core cpu's, all those six core cpu's, all those four core cpu's, and hyperthreading is available on only *some* of the eight core SKU's!
Valantar - Tuesday, April 23, 2019 - link
"Musclebook"? Oh dear. Ugh. They're really going after the insecure hypermasculine crowd here, aren't they?bji - Tuesday, April 23, 2019 - link
You're saying women don't have muscles? Sexist.