CPU Benchmark Performance: Legacy Tests

In order to gather data to compare with older benchmarks, we are still keeping a number of tests under our ‘legacy’ section. This includes all the former major versions of CineBench (R15, R11.5, R10) as well as Geekbench 4 and 5. We won’t be transferring the data over from the old testing into Bench, otherwise, it would be populated with 200 CPUs with only one data point, so it will fill up as we test more CPUs like the others.

We are using DDR5 memory on the 12th and 13th Gen Core parts, as well as the Ryzen 7000 series, at the following settings:

  • DDR5-5600B CL46 - Intel 13th Gen
  • DDR5-5200 CL44 - Ryzen 7000
  • DDR5-4800 (B) CL40 - Intel 12th Gen

All other CPUs such as Ryzen 5000 and 3000 were tested at the relevant JEDEC settings as per the processor's individual memory support with DDR4.

Legacy

(6.1) CineBench R10 ST

(6.1b) CineBench R10 MT

(6-2) CineBench R11.5 ST

(6-2b) CineBench R11.5 MT

(6-3) CineBench R15 ST

(6-3b) CineBench R15 MT

(6-4) CineBench R20 ST

(6-4b) CineBench R20 MT

(6-5) Geekbench 4.0 ST

(6-5b) Geekbench 4.0 MT

(6-6) Geekbench 5 ST

(6-6b) Geekbench 5 MT

(6-8) Handbrake 1.3.2, 1080p30 H264 to 480p Discord

(6-8b) Handbrake 1.3.2, 1080p30 H264 to 720p YouTube

(6-8c) Handbrake 1.3.2, 1080p30 H264 to 4K60 HEVC

Our legacy tests are quite outdated, or they aren't a good fit for other sections in our CPU reviews. Still, the Ryzen 7000 65 W CPUs perform well, and trade blows with various SKUs; the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 at 65 W is out performing the Intel Core i5-12600K and is trading blows with the Core i7-12700K, which is still impressive.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Rendering And Encoding Gaming Performance: 720p And Lower
Comments Locked

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • Zucker2k - Wednesday, January 11, 2023 - link

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/17418/amd-corrects-...
    65x1.35 =87.75ppt
    105x1.35=141.75ppt
    120x1.35=162ppt
    125x1.35=168.75ppt
    170x1.35=229.5ppt
  • juhatus - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link

    "Looking at the Ryzen 9 7900, it marginally beats out the Ryzen 9 _7950X_ and sits" - Typo, should be 5950X, above borderlands 3 test on conclusion page.
  • Gavin Bonshor - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link

    Thank you for spotting that!
  • MadAd - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link

    Did I miss the single core performance test?
  • djsvetljo - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link

    I am concerned about Zen4 minimum power draw (idle). Judging by graphs on page 2, it seems like CPU consumes 20 watt on idle???

    Going back to the Zen4 X comparison vs 13th gen, Intel seems to have advantage at idle. Planning to update home server that sits on idle or very low load 80% of the day, but needs to be on 24/7. I eventually am planing to run VMs on it (rare gaming with GPU pass thru). Thoughts?
  • duploxxx - Tuesday, January 10, 2023 - link

    thoughts? you are creating a wacko system. one site you want to have low low idle, and than intel is better although the latest generation is less difference... its not the cpu, its the total package with pci-e5 etc that is upping the idle power. on the other side you want GPU power which eats already 50% of your total idle power. so the diff between intel and amd will now be only way less vs total idle.. on top for VM you should have an AMD multicore for sure. my advise? wait for the 7000 APU it might fit both your needs.
  • kpb321 - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link

    Is it just me or do the 7600x and 7700x just seem like bad deals compared to the newly released chips. $30 moves you up to the 7700 or 7900 respectively with the same rated boost clocks for ST task. Lower base clocks will hurt but the additional cores will help compensate in most MT situations. The 7700 beats the 7600x in many of the multi-threaded tests and does it for a small premium and while using a lot less power in the process.
  • steveofwa - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link

    Seems like there is no reason for the "x" versions to exist. They can have their non X with good power efficiency, and the x3d for performance.
  • Byte - Tuesday, January 10, 2023 - link

    X is now the "founders" edition where rather than get discounts like kickstarter, you pay for the privilege for getting it first. Nvidia did this with the 2080Ti FE being $1200 whereas msrp was $999. They saw it work well so everyone taking a page. Ryzen traditionally launched with non-X and that was the go to. The X is mostly for emotional reasons which plays a bigger factor in marketing than you think. Most people will never lower themselves to a x700 series card for instance. That is why nvidia did two 4080s in the beginning but backtracked. Wrong move.
  • AndrewJacksonZA - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link

    Hi. For "(3-3) Dolphin 5.0 Render Test" you have the test results in your Bench different to the test results in the graph.

    In the graph:
    Intel Core i9-12900KS = 182.2

    In your Bench:
    Intel Core i9-12900KS with DDR5 = 169
    Intel Core i9-12900K with DDR4 = 181

    Also, according to your Bench, for "(3-4c) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 20K Hybrid," the i3-12300 with a score of 72 beats *ALL* the new Ryzen 7xxx CPUs. Can you confirm that please?

    I haven't checked any of the other results to your bench but suspect that more might also be different. Also, are efforts underway to update the Bench to include these results, please?

    Thank you

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now