CPU Benchmark Performance: Rendering And Encoding

Rendering tests, compared to others, are often a little more simple to digest and automate. All the tests put out some sort of score or time, usually in an obtainable way that makes it fairly easy to extract. These tests are some of the most strenuous in our list, due to the highly threaded nature of rendering and ray-tracing, and can draw a lot of power.

If a system is not properly configured to deal with the thermal requirements of the processor, the rendering benchmarks are where it would show most easily as the frequency drops over a sustained period of time. Most benchmarks in this case are re-run several times, and the key to this is having an appropriate idle/wait time between benchmarks to allow for temperatures to normalize from the last test.

One of the interesting elements of modern processors is encoding performance. This covers two main areas: encryption/decryption for secure data transfer, and video transcoding from one video format to another.

In the encrypt/decrypt scenario, how data is transferred and by what mechanism is pertinent to on-the-fly encryption of sensitive data - a process by which more modern devices are leaning to for software security.

We are using DDR5 memory on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and the other Ryzen 7000 series we've tested. This also includes Intel's 13th and 12th Gen processors. We tested the aforementioned platforms with the following settings:

  • DDR5-5600B CL46 - Intel 13th Gen
  • DDR5-5200 CL44 - Ryzen 7000
  • DDR5-4800 (B) CL40 - Intel 12th Gen

All other CPUs such as Ryzen 5000 and 3000 were tested at the relevant JEDEC settings as per the processor's individual memory support with DDR4.

Rendering

(4-1) Blender 3.3 BMW27: Compute

(4-1b) Blender 3.3 Classroom: Compute

(4-1c) Blender 3.3 Fishy Cat: Compute

(4-1d) Blender 3.3 Pabellon Barcelona: Compute

(4-1e) Blender 3.3 Barbershop: Compute

(4-3) POV-Ray 3.7.1

(4-4) V-Ray Renderer

(4-5) C-Ray 1.1: 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel

(4-6) CineBench R23 Single Thread

(4-6b) CineBench R23 Multi-Thread

When it comes to rendering, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D doesn't quite hit the compute performance of the Ryzen 9 7950X, but it isn't too far off, given the discrepancies in power usage. It shows that the 7950X3D is more than capable of rendering workloads in an effective manner.

Encoding

(5-2) 7-Zip 1900 Compression

(5-2b) 7-Zip 1900 Decompression

(5-2c) 7-Zip 1900 Combined Score

(5-3) WinRAR 5.90 Test, 3477 files, 1.96 GB

(5-4) x264, Bosphorus 1080p

(5-4b) x264, Bosphorus 4K

Our encoding section of the test suite is similar to other sections, where the 7950X is the faster and more power-hungry chip, which does output more performance. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D does however put in a respectable performance.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Simulation CPU Benchmark Performance: Legacy Tests
Comments Locked

122 Comments

View All Comments

  • Oxford Guy - Wednesday, March 1, 2023 - link

    Has Intel or AMD ever invalidated a warranty for turning on XMP?

    Please post an article about this to answer that question.
  • cheshirster - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    Always has been )
    They are risking with their "access to the body" by showing AMD on top.
  • Gastec - Wednesday, March 1, 2023 - link

    Well, the world is not feeding trolls as much as it used to do, because of disruptions in the "serials" supply blockchains.
  • HarryVoyager - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    Definitely looks like AMD is using this as a dry run for their rumored Zen 4c architecture. From the rumors I've seen, they were able to pack about two Zen 4c cores into the space of a standard Zen 4 core by repackaging the logic and removing half the cache. But that means to use them as super E-cores, they need a scheduler that can handle by cache, not frequency like Intel's does.

    By launching the dual CCD CPUs first, they're able to see and work through those issues now, on a low risk platform before they go full heterogenius. Very shrewd on AMD's part.
  • nandnandnand - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    Shrewd, but only if it works in the end. And the buyers of these high-end gaming parts are the beta testers.
  • AvidGamer - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    That says a lot about the perception and respect AMD has for its ordinary, loyal customers, using them as Beta testers, what a deplorable custom!
  • nandnandnand - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    It's Alder Lake all over again, but with an apparently dumb method of optimizing for specific programs.

    We will have to live with it though. big.LITTLE in some form is here to stay over at Intel, and we've seen rumors of Zen 5 + Zen 4C on desktop.
  • Gastec - Wednesday, March 1, 2023 - link

    It's only $700 bucks, come on! Pocket change for successful influencers!
  • AvidGamer - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    Fully agree with you there! Interesting and thought provoking comment, thanks for sharing your thoughts on this matter! I too believe that some of the practices of AMD are often rather shrewd in their nature...
  • Targon - Tuesday, February 28, 2023 - link

    Not even close to what is going on. The 5800X3D was clearly the final chip for socket AM4, and yes, it was primarily focused on gaming since that is where that 3D stacked cache tends to benefit users more.

    For the Zen4 versions, you will see the 7800X3D, which has one CCD, then the 7900X3D and 7950X3D. For the dual-CCD chips, because GAMES don't use more than eight cores, AMD did the best mix, apply the stacked cache to one CCD, leaving the other CCD without, just so it can be clocked higher. Again, games are pretty much the only chips that show the benefit to the extra cache, so why put the stacked cache on both CCDs?

    Zen4c is going to be for servers that will use more cores, but don't need as much cache to operate. When more cores is more important than the very best performance per core, Zen4c makes more sense. There is nothing about stacked cache that applies to Zen4c.

    Intel E-cores are pretty much garbage, less functional(they didn't include AVX-512 even when the performance cores did), but more cores DOES benefit certain types of workloads. Note that Intel laptop chips are using this almost to deceive consumers, dual performance core i7s with efficiency cores to make them not as bad will still be worse than any i7 should be. Intel used to sell a lot of low-priced i7 chips with only 2 cores/4 threads, so now, dual-performance cores with some efficiency cores to be not as bad as dual-core i7 chips used to be.

    Now, the 7800X3D will be only a single CCD part, so the ONE CCD will have the 3D stacked cache on it. AMD is doing this because the volume of sales for the dual-CCD X3D chips is expected to be fairly low, while the 7800X3D will probably have a very high volume of sales. It's best not to encourage all of the stacked cache modules to go to the 7800X3D where the highest demand will be.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now